Lou Paduano | Urban Fantasy Novels | Sci-Fi Crime Series

  • Home
  • Books
  • Order a Signed Book
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Greystone
  • DSA
  • Greystone-in-Training
  • Box Sets
  • Free Books

Minor Characters – Asset or Distraction

February 6, 2017 By Lou

There is a balancing act when it comes to writing. It comes in many forms and can be handled in numerous ways. One of the main issues I have found while working on The Medusa Coin relates to minor characters vs their major counterparts and the juggling act therein.

The need for minor characters

Minor characters inhabit the world surrounding your principal players. From the man handing over a cup of coffee to Officer John Pratchett in the Greystone series they are a vitally integral component in fleshing out the world of your main characters.

They act as counterpoints for character arcs, offering opposing viewpoints or giving an outsider perspective to issues going on in the background of your story. They bring color to the black and white principles of the main character’s world. Their roles include love interests and foils put in place as obstacles to keep them from their goals.

Whatever the role they are necessary to the end result; a fully formed world for your reader to lose themselves in.

Where minor characters distract:

When minor characters become principal players in the novel it can be jarring for the reader. Unless the transition is gradual and accepted by the reading public, more often than not there will be fan outcry at the loss of visibility for their favorite hero or heroine.

There is an old Superman tale I always come back to when it comes to this issue. The story is called Panic in the Sky and deals with Brainiac invading Earth with his Warworld fortress. Superman leads the charge, commanding a cadre of heroes, against the forces of Brainiac.

The story is amazing. Well thought out with high stakes. Superman is put through a real test during the course of the piece. Then at the climax Superman DOESN’T save the day. Someone else does. A woman named Maxima.

MAXIMA? WTH?

Now, being a comic nerd I understood what the author, Dan Jurgens was doing here. He was setting up Maxima and Superman’s entrance into a new incarnation of the Justice League. However, for a Superman story to lose sight of the man of steel so completely at the finale of a long arc was a tragedy of the worst kind. It pulled me right out of the story and is painful to read even now. (Pretty to look at though.)

This would be akin to the Lone Gunmen showing up in The X-Files finale and ending the threat of the Cigarette Smoking Man once and for all. (If they had survived until the finale – stupid Season 9…)

Or Dean Thomas saving Hogwarts while Harry Potter slept one off at Hagrid’s. (WHO THE HELL IS DEAN THOMAS?!)

In the words of the Earl of Lemongrab from Adventure Time – UNACCEPTABLE.

How minor characters best serve a story:

Much of what I spoke about above are the ways a minor character best serves a story. A foil for the protagonist. A love interest. An obstacle. A counterpoint. Someone that brings humor to a dreary situation or brings conflict with an opposing perspective on a situation.

Someone that adds a layer that wasn’t there without them in the room.

The very best way to use a minor character is to give them A moment not EVERY moment. Maybe it is a one-off joke. That’s how Pratchett started off for me in Signs of Portents. Now I try to work him into the story more often in order to showcase that differing perspective.

The story remains centered around your principal players. Stay true to that, while allowing the minor roles to add depth to the plot and conflict to your character arcs.

Thanks for reading.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Filed Under: Writing Tagged With: Adventure Time, Harry Potter, minor characters, Panic in the Sky, Superman, X-Files

The Drawback of Writing a Book Series

November 14, 2016 By Lou

I wrote about what makes writing (and reading) a book series so appealing last week. This week I want to go the opposite track and discuss the cons of working in the confines of a series.

Seeing a book series through to the end.

There is a level of expectation when writing a series. Especially to the reader. When an author dives into a series there is the belief that they will see it through to the end. Look at the Harry Potter series. Imagine that J.K. Rowling decided halfway through The Goblet of Fire that she needed to work on A Casual Vacancy next instead of starting the fifth book of everyone’s favorite wizard? Imagine the outcry from fandom for that little decision? Think what Warner Brothers would have done if they caught up with the books when making the films?

Writing a series can be freeing in some respects. I wrote about them previously. The level of comfort in living within an existing world. But what if you discover a new world in the telling? What if you feel the pull to something new halfway into your narrative (this being a multi-book narrative not the middle of a single book)? Do you walk away from your current series and the fans of such work to create something new? Or are you stuck?

Greystone’s first “cycle”

I’ve thought about this for some time. By the time the fifth book (three novels and two short story collections) of the Greystone series comes out I will have spent over two years of my life working on nothing else. If I take into account the previous attempts to put together Signs of Portents over the last decade it is more like four years. Quite an extensive portion of time.

And that’s not the end of the story. Not by a long shot. But I’ve created small windows in the narrative to give myself time to create other worlds. Build other stories or series. And then come back to Portents, Loren and Soriya for another couple of years.

Not every writer has that luxury. The pressure of continually working within a specific series can be confining when other worlds beckon.

Spinning your book series in circles

Having a series is a great idea in theory. Growing characters. Seeing them through a journey unable to be contained within a single work. But what if the plot of a book series takes precedent over the growth of those characters?

Excuse the return to the Harry Potter world but my daughter keeps pulling it off the shelf for some reason and it’s stuck in my head. Think about it though. What if Rowling focused so fully on the return of Voldemort she forgot that Harry, Ron and Hermione were living, breathing characters that needed to evolve with each book? What if she knew where they ended up but it was built out so far in the future that she ended up stunting their growth to keep the journey going for book after book?

Spinning in circles is a real problem and finding the hook for a character for their third or thirteenth appearance can be a real challenge. If the character has nothing to strive for, if it is forced upon both them and the reader, is there really a need to continue the series?

A lack of focus

Much like the questions asked above with a book series, there is the fear of losing focus over the life of the series. I’ve read quite a few comics in my day. (You might be surprised to learn that. Don’t be.) Something I always find with writer’s that overstay their welcome on a title is that the focus turns away from the main characters completely for a supporting character that has more room for growth.

Reader’s hate this. They don’t pick up a Jack Reacher book to read about Joe Schmoe in the background that seems to pop up every other chapter. They want to know what the hell Jack Reacher is going to do next. (I totally was going to bring up Harry Potter again. One track mind today.)

If the writer can’t find something interesting to say about their main characters and rely on supporting or even new players to showcase the world of the book series then maybe it is time to button it up. Maybe there has been enough mileage on a single concept.

These are things I constantly worry about, toy with when developing a story into a series to make sure there is enough meat there to keep the reader coming back for more. It is part of the reason for the break from Greystone after book five, to make sure there is something there for the next “cycle” for Soriya, Loren and the rest of the cast. The plot is there to be sure but that is only half the battle. The characters are the rest.

Readers know this and ultimately they deserve the best with each and every installment.

Thanks for reading.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn

Filed Under: Greystone, Writing Tagged With: book series, Greystone, Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling, Jack Reacher

Resurrectionists

Buy Your Copy Today!

Recent Posts

  • Greystone Series Sale Ends Today
  • Errant Knight is now on Patreon!
  • Alpha and Omega is out today!
  • Alpha and Omega Sneak Peek
  • Errant Knight Cover Reveal

Disclaimer: Links throughout this site may be affiliate links. All commission earned through these links go to Eleven Ten Publishing to produce more books for your reading pleasure.

You can view our privacy policy here.

Recent Posts

  • Greystone Series Sale Ends Today
  • Errant Knight is now on Patreon!
  • Alpha and Omega is out today!
  • Alpha and Omega Sneak Peek
  • Errant Knight Cover Reveal

Join My Newsletter Today!

Sign up for news and special offers!

Thank you!

You have successfully joined my newsletter list.

Copyright © 2025 Lou Paduano